Learn why extending a Spring @ Component class from a @ Configuration class can cause proxy issues and how to properly inject dependencies instead.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/79508504/ asked by the user 'NoOne' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9570228/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/79508538/ provided by the user 'Szymon Roziewski' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4373784/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Configuration class extends Component class in spring
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to drop me a comment under this video.
---
Understanding the Problem
In Spring applications, it might seem convenient to have a @ Configuration class extend a @ Component class to reuse code. However, this approach is not recommended and can lead to subtle proxying and lifecycle issues.
What Happens When You Extend?
A @ Component class is a Spring-managed bean with its own lifecycle and proxy behavior.
A @ Configuration class is enhanced by CGLIB proxies to manage singleton beans correctly.
Extending a @ Component from a @ Configuration class mixes these proxy mechanisms, which can cause unexpected behaviors.
For example, if ConfigClass extends BaseComponent, Spring might create proxies that interfere, leading to conflicts or incorrect bean resolutions.
Recommended Solution: Use Composition Instead of Inheritance
Instead of inheritance, inject the @ Component into the @ Configuration class. This approach keeps proxy management clear and avoids conflicts.
Correct Pattern:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Benefits
Clear separation of concerns between configuration and components.
Avoids proxying conflicts tied to inheritance.
Enables flexible and testable code.
Summary
Avoid making a @ Configuration class extend a @ Component class.
@ Configuration classes rely on CGLIB proxies for managing singleton beans.
Mixing proxy behaviors via inheritance can cause bean lifecycle and injection issues.
Use dependency injection (composition) to share functionality between these classes.
Following these principles ensures your Spring application remains clean, maintainable, and free from proxy-related surprises.
Auf dieser Seite können Sie das Online-Video Why You Should Not Extend a @ Component Class with a @ Configuration Class in Spring mit der Dauer stunde minuten sekunde in guter Qualität ansehen, das der Benutzer vlogommentary 16 Dezember 2025 hochgeladen hat, den Link mit Freunden und Bekannten teilen, dieses Video wurde auf Youtube bereits 3 Mal angesehen und es wurde von like den Zuschauern gefallen. Viel Spaß beim Betrachtenden Zuschauern gefallen!